When Is Evidence of Your Attacker’s Character Admissible In Court?

Hey folks,

During the Zimmerman trial there was considerable consternation among much of the pubic that the trial judge, Debra Nelson, had excluded certain evidence about Trayvon Martin’s past, including his apparent drug use, illegal firearms dealing, passion for “street fighting”, among other pleasant character traits.

Now that the trial has ended in a not guilty verdict Judge Nelson’s evidentiary decisions will never face the scathing reversals they so richly deserve, and I won’t seek to revisit them here. Those decisions do, however, raise some more general evidentiary questions in the context of the law of self-defense. In particular, they raise the question of when, and why, you might be able to introduce into evidence information about the character of the person against whom you used defensive force.

To see my extensive analysis of how character evidence can, and cannot, be introduced into a self-defense trial, take a gander over at my blog post at Legal Insurrection:

When Is Evidence of Your Attacker’s Character Admissible In Court?

In the meantime, don’t forget I’m scheduling my fall Law of Self Defense Seminars right now.  If you’re interested in attending, or being a hosting group, contact us at seminars@lawofselfdefense.com.

–Andrew, @LawSelfDefense


Andrew is currently in the process of planning his Fall 2013 Seminar Tour. This time he’ll be traveling from Boston, down the East coast, and then west to East Texas. Planned stops include (1) the Quantico area in Virginia, (2) Columbia, SC, (3) Atlanta, GA, (4) Houston, TX, (5) San Antonio, TX (6) Austin, TX (7) Dallas, TX, then back to Houston and the return trip back to Boston (with similar stops on the way home). Specific dates are being hashed out as I talk with groups interested in hosting seminars, but the trip will definitely be built around the Gun Rights Policy Conference being held in Houston, TX on September 27, 28, 29–so, which I am attending, so plan on the week before and the week after as likely seminar dates. Anyone interested in hosting or attending a seminar anywhere along that route, please contact me directly via the contact form on my blog to get more information.

Andrew F. Branca is an MA lawyer and author of the seminal book “The Law of Self Defense,, 2nd Edition” now available at www.lawofselfdefense.com and also at Amazon.com as either a hardcopy or in Kindle version.

You can follow Andrew on Twitter on @LawSelfDefense and using #LOSD2, on Facebook,, and at his blog, The Law of Self Defense.

About the Author

Andrew Branca
Andrew F. Branca is a Massachusetts lawyer and the author of the seminal book “The Law of Self Defense, 3rd Edition,” available at the Law of Self Defense website (autographed copies available) and Amazon.com (paperback and Kindle), and many other re-sellers. Andrew just launched his latest product, the LOSD Instructor Program, designed for gun safety, marksmanship and tactical strategy instructors. Be an elite member of the self defense community, understanding your state's self defense laws to a depth even lawyers rarely achieve. Check it out here.   Andrew also gives live, in-person, ~5 hour-long state-specific Law of Self Defense Seminars all over the country. Click here to find a live seminar covering your state's self-defense laws.   Andrew also produces many 4-5 hour online, on-demand state-specific Law of Self Defense training courses. These online classes are enriched versions of the live, in-person state-specific Law of Self Defense Class Andrew gives all around the country. Click here to find an online course for your state. These online classes are priced at $249/HOUSEHOLD. You can learn more details and view the first section of the training class for free (about 30 minutes worth of self-defense law training) by clicking here.

3 Comments on "When Is Evidence of Your Attacker’s Character Admissible In Court?"

  1. I’m about half way through the Law Of Self Defense book by Andrew Branca. It has been very enlightening to me. The author can speak non-legalese thereby making it quite for a non-lawyer type as myself. Lots of good and up to date info here. So far I give it 5 stars!

  2. Thanks for the kind words! 🙂


  3. Andrew, I cannot help myself because I am a spelling nazi, but please change “pubic” to public because… well you do know what pubic means!!

    I think that this story is not finished. I think that Nelson was wrong when she excluded that evidence.

Leave a comment